UK HQ Your time

Water-Treatment Design Benchmarks & Reference Data

A free, curated reference of the design envelopes our engineers actually use — surface-loading rates, RO pressure and energy figures, sludge cake dryness, and process-selection rules of thumb. Drawn from recognised standards and Reynolds & Bauhm project practice, gathered onto one citable page.

Standards-referenced
Project-validated
Free to use & cite

These are typical design envelopes for budgeting and concept design — the starting points a process engineer brackets against the real water analysis, the manufacturer’s curve and the project specification. They are not a substitute for detailed design, but they are the numbers worth knowing before you start. Free to reference; a citation or link back is appreciated.

DAF vs Lamella vs Gravity Settling

Choose by particle density, footprint and sludge target

ParameterDissolved Air Flotation (DAF)Lamella (inclined plate)Gravity settling
Best forLow-density solids, oil/FOG, algaeDense settleable solids, compact footprintDense solids, large flows, low cost
Surface loading rate5–15 m/h2–3 m/h (on projected area)0.5–1.5 m/h
Footprint vs settling3–5× smaller3–5× smaller (plate multiplier)Baseline (largest)
Typical TSS removal80–95%85–95%50–70%
Float / sludge solids2–5% (floated)1–3% (settled)1–3% (settled)

DAF sizing calculator → · Lamella design calculator → · Full comparison →

Dissolved Air Flotation — Typical Design Envelope

ParameterTypical value
Surface (hydraulic) loading rate5–15 m/h
Air-to-solids ratio (A:S)0.005–0.06 mg air / mg solids
Saturator pressure4–6 bar
Recycle ratio6–30% of feed
Micro-bubble size30–50 micron
Dissolved air at 5.5 bar (Henry’s law)~90–110 mg/L
Expected O&G removal85–95%

Seawater vs Brackish RO — Pressure, Recovery & Energy

Feed salinity sets the whole equipment class

ParameterSeawater RO (SWRO)Brackish RO (BWRO)
Feed TDS~35,000 mg/L1,000–10,000 mg/L
Operating pressure~55–70 bar~10–18 bar
Recovery40–50%65–80%
Specific energy~3–4 kWh/m³ (with energy recovery)~0.5–1 kWh/m³
Energy recovery deviceEssential (PX exchanger ~95% eff.)Not required
Salt rejection99.5–99.8%97–99%
Design flux12–17 L/m²/h20–30 L/m²/h

Containerised DAF/RO configurations → · RO energy recovery →

Cake Dryness by Dewatering Method

MethodTypical cake dryness (% DS)Notes
Gravity thickening3–6%Pre-thickening stage, not a cake
Belt filter press15–25%Continuous, moderate energy
Decanter centrifuge20–30%Continuous, higher energy, enclosed
Screw press18–25%Low speed, low energy, low noise
Plate-and-frame filter press30–40%Driest cake; batch process

Velocity & Pump-Selection Rules of Thumb

ParameterTypical value
Pump suction velocity0.6–1.5 m/s
Pump discharge velocity1.5–3 m/s
Erosional velocity (API RP 14E, water)~3.9 m/s (C = 122)
NPSH margin (available over required)≥ 0.5–1 m (or 10–30%)
Positive-displacement useViscous, shear-sensitive, metering, constant flow

Pump selector → · Pipe pressure-drop calculator →

How to Cite This Page

Free to reference — a link back is appreciated

Reynolds & Bauhm. “Water-Treatment Design Benchmarks & Reference Data.” reynoldsbauhm.co.uk/water-treatment-design-benchmarks

These figures are typical design envelopes compiled from recognised standards (e.g. ASME, EN, API RP 14E, the Hydraulic Institute) and Reynolds & Bauhm project experience, for early-stage design and estimating. Always confirm against your specific water analysis, the manufacturer’s performance data and the relevant code before procurement.

Need These Figures Turned Into a Design?

Our engineers size DAF, RO, clarification, dewatering and dosing systems to your actual water — with free calculators to start and a guaranteed design to finish.

Related Pages

Free tools and guides behind these benchmarks