UK HQ Your time

Automated Brewery pH Neutralisation

Two-stage automated pH correction stabilised a brewery effluent swinging pH 4–11 to a steady 6.5–8.0, cutting reagent use 35%.

6.5–8.0
pH to Sewer
35%
Reagent Saved
100%
Consent Met

The Challenge

A brewery discharged effluent swinging between pH 4 and 11 as CIP cycles changed, repeatedly breaching its pH 6–9 consent and over-dosing reagent in a single aggressive control loop.

For brewery & beverage operators, chemical dosing problems of this kind translate straight into cost and risk — higher chemical and energy use, lost treatment capacity, a heavier maintenance burden and, ultimately, the threat of a discharge-consent breach. The temptation is to bolt on equipment and hope; the reliable route is to measure the actual stream first, understand what is really driving the problem, and only then select and size the treatment. That diagnostic discipline is where this project started.

The Engineered Solution

Reynolds & Bauhm engineered an integrated response sized to the measured duty rather than a catalogue specification. The solution combined several coordinated measures:

  • Two-stage coarse + trim neutralisation on a steep titration curve
  • CO2 for self-limiting acid trim, caustic for alkali
  • Compound-loop control: flow-pace + dual pH feedback
  • Bunded dosing skid with calibration columns

Illustrative project

This is a representative scenario showing how Reynolds & Bauhm approaches a brewery & beverage challenge of this type. Figures are typical of the technology applied; every project is sized and validated to your own data.

How the Solution Was Delivered

Two-stage coarse + trim neutralisation on a steep titration curve. CO2 for self-limiting acid trim, caustic for alkali. Compound-loop control: flow-pace + dual pH feedback. Bunded dosing skid with calibration columns. Each stage was selected against the stream analysis and sized with a sensible design margin, then drawn up as a P&ID and functional design specification. The system was built and, where appropriate, factory wet-tested before delivery, so that interface and performance risks were resolved in the works rather than on site. Commissioning included calibration of the instruments and tuning of the control loops against live conditions, with operator training and full O&M documentation at handover — so the plant met its targets from start-up and stayed there.

Validated Outcome

ParameterBeforeAfter
pH range to sewer4–116.5–8.0
Consent breaches/month5–80
Reagent costbaseline−35%

Beyond the headline figures, the project delivered reliable, repeatable compliance and a measurable reduction in operating cost — the combination that justifies the investment and protects the site against tightening regulation.

Why This Approach Works

Diagnose before designing

The treatment train was built around a real stream analysis, not an assumption — the single biggest determinant of whether a brewery & beverage plant succeeds.

Right technology for the duty

Each stage earns its place against the measured load, avoiding both under-treatment and the cost of over-engineering.

Validated & documented

Factory testing, commissioning and full documentation mean the result is provable and auditable, not just claimed.

Transferable

The same engineering approach transfers to comparable brewery & beverage sites with similar chemical dosing duties.

Related Case Studies & Pages

Have a similar challenge?

Our engineers can assess feasibility and propose a validated, sized solution for your brewery & beverage application. Send us your flow, stream analysis and target consent and we will scope the treatment train, size it and set out the options.

Industries We Serve

Our expertise spans multiple industries with sector-specific water treatment solutions.