UK HQ Your time

Flocculant Polymer Dosing

Polymer flocculants bridge coagulated micro-flocs into large, settleable agglomerates. Choosing the right polymer (anionic, cationic, nonionic), preparing it correctly, and dosing at the right G-value determines clarification and dewatering performance. This page covers the engineering.

What Polymers Do

Long-chain polymers bridge micro-flocs into rapidly-settling agglomerates.

Coagulants neutralise particle charge to allow initial agglomeration. Polymers — long-chain high-molecular-weight molecules — then bridge these primary flocs into large, dense, fast-settling secondary flocs. The mechanism is “inter-particle bridging”: the polymer chain attaches at multiple points to different particles, pulling them together. A second mechanism, “charge patching”, applies when cationic polymer attaches to negative particles and locally reverses their surface charge, allowing nearby unaltered particles to attach. Both mechanisms rely on the polymer being dispersed at the molecular level before contact with the floc — which is why polymer preparation is as important as polymer selection.

Anionic, Cationic & Nonionic

Anionic Polyacrylamide

Carboxylate functional groups carry a negative charge. Best when used after coagulation — coagulant has already neutralised particle charge; anionic polymer bridges via hydrogen bonding to metal-hydroxide flocs.

  • MW: 5–20 million Da
  • Charge density: 5–60% (mole percent anionic)
  • Dose: 0.1–5.0 mg/L typical
  • Best for: post-coagulation clarification, mineral slurries, kaolin

Cationic Polyacrylamide

Quaternary ammonium groups carry permanent positive charge. Works alone (without coagulant) on negative organic particles — ideal for sludge dewatering.

  • MW: 2–15 million Da
  • Charge density: 5–80%
  • Dose: 2–20 g per kg dry solids (sludge)
  • Best for: organic sludge dewatering, primary clarification of dairy/food/brewery effluent

Nonionic Polyacrylamide

No formal charge; bridging is purely physical entanglement and hydrogen bonding. Insensitive to pH and ionic strength.

  • MW: 5–15 million Da
  • Charge density: zero
  • Dose: 0.5–5 mg/L
  • Best for: variable-pH streams, highly saline waters, niche applications

Matching Polymer to Application

Charge sign matches the particle’s surface charge after coagulation; charge density and MW are tuned to the floc structure needed.

ApplicationPolymer typeCharge densityTypical dose
Drinking-water clarification (after alum/ferric)Anionic PAM10–30%0.05–0.5 mg/L
Industrial DAF (food/brewery)Cationic PAM20–50%1–5 mg/L
Activated sludge thickening (belt thickener)Cationic PAM30–55%3–8 g/kg DS
Activated sludge dewatering (centrifuge)Cationic PAM40–70%8–15 g/kg DS
Anaerobically-digested sludge dewateringCationic PAM50–80%10–20 g/kg DS
Mineral tailings thickeningAnionic PAM30–60%20–100 g/t solids
Coal washery clarificationAnionic PAM (high MW)15–40%0.5–3 mg/L
Oily wastewater (DAF after DGF)Cationic PAM30–60%1–3 mg/L
Phosphate-rich sludge dewateringCationic PAM (high MW)50–70%10–18 g/kg DS

All values indicative. Polymer selection is best confirmed by laboratory or on-site jar testing using your actual influent or sludge.

Polymer Preparation: Where Most Polymer Failures Begin

A polymer that has not fully hydrated is functionally inert. Get the preparation right.

Polyacrylamide is supplied as fine white powder, dispersion in oil, or pre-dissolved liquid “emulsion” products. All forms must be diluted into water and given time to hydrate before reaching the floc reactor. Inadequate preparation is the single most common reason for polymer performance disappointment.

The preparation cycle has three phases:

  • Wetting: powder/emulsion meets water; rapid stirring to prevent “fish-eye” agglomeration
  • Hydration / ageing: 30–60 minutes gentle stirring to allow polymer chains to fully uncoil
  • Dilution: just before injection, in-line dilute the stock solution by 5–10x to ensure rapid dispersion in the process stream
View Polymer Preparation Stations

Typical preparation parameters

Stock concentration0.2–0.5% (powder) / 1–2% (emulsion)
Wetting time2–5 minutes high-shear
Ageing time30–60 minutes gentle stir
Dilution at injection5–10x (final 0.05–0.1%)
Storage life (prepared)24–72 hours max
Make-up water quality<1 NTU, free of Fe/Mn/Cl₂

Mixing Intensity & G-Value

Polymer mixing intensity defines floc structure and dewaterability.

Polymer is added to the process stream and must disperse uniformly without breaking already-formed flocs. The standard measure of mixing energy is the velocity gradient G (1/s):

G = √(P / μV)

P = mixer power dissipation (W); μ = water viscosity (kg/m·s); V = reactor volume (m³). G has units of 1/s — the rate of velocity change across the fluid.

  • Polymer injection point: G > 200 s⁻¹ for rapid dispersion
  • Floc growth zone: G = 30–80 s⁻¹ (gentle — preserves bridges)
  • Floc aging zone (sometimes used): G = 10–30 s⁻¹
  • Dewatering equipment: G can exceed 5000 s⁻¹ (centrifuge) — selects for shear-resistant polymers

Why G matters

Too low G: poor dispersion; polymer streams through reactor unmixed; poor floc.
Too high G: polymer bridges break before they can grow; sheared floc cannot be rebuilt.
Right G: rapid dispersion at injection, then gentle aggregation downstream.

Floc shear sensitivity

Polymer floc bonds, once broken, do not re-form. This is why polymer is always dosed at the FINAL high-shear point before the clarifier/DAF/dewatering machine — not upstream of any pumps, mixers or restrictions.

Sludge Dewatering — Where Polymer Choice Pays Back Fastest

The largest single polymer cost in most plants. A 20% dose reduction translates directly to Operating expenditure.

Sludge dewatering equipment (belt press, screw press, centrifuge) all need high-cationic-charge polymer to neutralise the strongly-negative organic sludge particles and form a dewaterable floc. The chosen polymer determines:

  • Cake dryness (% dry solids in dewatered cake): higher polymer dose → higher cake solids, up to a plateau
  • Filtrate / centrate quality (TSS in liquid back to plant): better polymer → cleaner return
  • Polymer cost per tonne dry solids treated
  • Sludge cake transport rate (drier cake = lower tonnage)

Trade-offs are non-linear. Optimisation requires polymer screening on actual sludge using small-scale dewatering tests (Buchner funnel, CST, centrifuge bottle test).

View dewatering equipment

Polymer optimisation gains — real example

MetricOld polymerOptimised polymer
Polymer typeGeneric cationic PAMHigher MW cationic + 60% charge
Polymer dose (g/kg DS)128
Cake solids (%)2226
Centrate TSS (mg/L)1100180
Polymer cost / t DS
Transport rate / t DS

Indicative figures — site dependent.

Polymer Pitfalls

Fish-Eye Agglomeration

Powder hits water too slowly → outer layer hydrates and gels → gel surrounds dry powder, preventing dispersion. Cure: dispersing eductor at the powder feed, high-shear initial wetting.

Inadequate Ageing

30 minutes is the minimum hydration time. Less → partially-coiled polymer → reduced bridging capacity → higher dose needed. Cure: sized two-tank ageing system with sequenced batches.

Stale Stock

Prepared polymer hydrolyses over 24–72 hours, losing charge density. After 5 days, solution may be 50% inert. Cure: discard unused stock daily; right-size make-up batches.

Wrong Make-Up Water

Fe, Mn, free chlorine, or pH extremes degrade polymer during preparation. Cure: dedicated polymer-prep water — softened & dechlorinated.

Related Pages

Optimise polymer dosing

Send us your sludge type, dewatering equipment and current polymer / dose / cake quality. We will run a comparative screening, recommend the optimal polymer family and design preparation infrastructure.

Industries We Serve

Our expertise spans multiple industries with sector-specific water treatment solutions.