UK HQ Your time
Advanced Oxidation

UV/H2O2 AOP Systems

Photochemical oxidation combining UV photolysis with hydrogen peroxide to generate hydroxyl radicals that mineralise recalcitrant organics, dyes, and micropollutants.

What is UV/H2O2?

UV/H2O2 AOP uses ultraviolet light (typically 254 nm) to photolyse hydrogen peroxide, generating hydroxyl radicals (OH β†’) with an oxidation potential of 2.8 V. These radicals non-selectively attack and break down complex organic molecules including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, dyes, and endocrine disruptors. The process is particularly effective for water reuse applications, pharmaceutical wastewater, and effluents with variable organic composition.

No Chemical Sludge

Unlike Fenton AOP, UV/H2O2 produces no iron hydroxide sludge – only H2O2 and UV are consumed.

Disinfection Bonus

254 nm UV provides simultaneous disinfection achieving 4-6 log pathogen reduction alongside oxidation.

Water Reuse Ready

Effluent contains only water, CO2, and trace salts – ideal for direct reuse without further polishing.

Dose On Demand

H2O2 dose automatically adjusted based on online UV transmittance (UVT) monitoring.

Process Steps

Step-by-step breakdown of the treatment process from influent to effluent.

01

pH optimisation to 5.5-7.0

Optimal pH for UV/H2O2 is neutral to mildly acidic. pH adjustment with CO2 or sulphuric acid ensures maximum OH β†’ generation efficiency.

02

UV Transmittance Conditioning

If influent UVT <65%, pre-treatment (coagulation or filtration) improves UV penetration. Online UVT analyser triggers automatic adjustments.

03

H2O2 Dosing & Mixing

Hydrogen peroxide (technical grade 35-50%) dosed via metering pump at 200-2,000 mg/L depending on target COD reduction. Static mixer ensures uniform distribution.

04

UV Reactor Irradiation

Medium-pressure UV lamps (1-5 kW per m3/h) provide 254 nm photons for H2O2 photolysis. Residence time 5-30 minutes. UV fluence 400-1,500 mJ/cm2.

05

Residual Quenching

Any residual H2O2 quenched with sodium bisulfite (1:1 stoichiometric) or allowed to decompose naturally in holding tank. Final effluent H2O2 <0.1 mg/L.

Typical Performance

85-95%
COD reduction
6-log
Coliform reduction
<0.1
mg/L residual H2O2
400-1500
mJ/cm2 UV fluence

Equipment Used in This Process

Explore the equipment components that make this process effective.

Where This Process is Applied

Pharmaceutical API

Destroy active pharmaceutical ingredients in wastewater to prevent environmental contamination.

Textile Dyehouse

Break down reactive dyes and colour compounds resistant to advanced biological treatment.

Water Reuse

Polish biological effluent to reuse quality by removing trace organics and pathogens.

Chemical Process

Treat effluents containing phenols, solvents, and chlorinated organics.

Related Processes & Technologies

Process Fundamentals & Design

This treatment stage is engineered to achieve specific contaminant removal targets while providing stable, predictable performance across variable inlet conditions. Design parameters are calculated from wastewater characterisation data, regulatory requirements, and site-specific constraints including footprint, energy availability, and operator capability.

Process Optimisation

Design validated by CFD modelling and pilot testing to confirm performance guarantees.

Mechanical Reliability

Equipment selected for 20-year design life with minimal wearing parts and easy access.

Chemical Efficiency

Automated dosing and feedback control minimise reagent consumption and sludge production.

Compliance Assurance

Online monitoring and data logging demonstrate continuous consent compliance.

Design Parameters

Design Flow10 – 5,000 mΒ³/h (application specific)
Inlet VariabilityDesigned for 1:3 peak-to-average flow ratio
Removal Efficiency85 – 99% depending on target contaminant
Hydraulic RetentionCalculated from kinetic constants and safety factors
Power Consumption0.5 – 5.0 kWh/100 mΒ³ (process dependent)
Chemical DoseAuto-controlled based on online analysers
Sludge Production0.2 – 1.5 kg DS/kg contaminant removed
MaterialsSS304, SS316L, or carbon steel with coating

Integration with Treatment Train

No treatment stage operates in isolation. This process is designed to receive conditioned influent from upstream stages and deliver effluent quality suitable for downstream processes. Hydraulic and organic loading rates are balanced across the complete treatment train to prevent bottlenecking and ensure overall plant efficiency. Our engineers model the complete flowsheet to optimise Capital expenditure and Operating expenditure across the plant lifecycle.

Upstream Protection

Screening, equalisation, and pre-treatment protect this stage from damage and overload.

Downstream Conditioning

Effluent quality ensures downstream biology, filtration, or disinfection performs optimally.

Recycle Streams

Reject streams, filtrate, and centrate are routed back to appropriate upstream points.

UV/H2O2 Reactor Sizing & Actinometry

Fluence, quantum yield and dose-response calculations for validated AOP performance.

UV Fluence (Dose)

Fluence H = I0 Γ— t Γ— Tf, where I0 = incident irradiance (mW/cm2), t = exposure time (s), and Tf = transmittance factor. Target H = 400–1,500 mJ/cm2 for AOP; 40–100 mJ/cm2 for disinfection alone.

Quantum Yield & Rate Constants

H2O2 photolysis quantum yield Φ ≈ 0.5 mol/E at 254 nm. Second-order rate constant for OH• + organics: 108–1010 M−1s−1. Pseudo-first-order decay constant kobs = 0.05–0.5 min−1 for typical industrial effluents.

H2O2 Dose Stoichiometry

Theoretical demand = 2.1 g H2O2 per g COD. In practice, dose 1.2–2.5 Γ— theoretical. Excess >500 mg/L scavenges OH• and raises residual quenching cost.

Actinometry Validation

Reactor validation requires chemical actinometry (iodide/iodate, ferrioxalate or uridine). Delivered fluence must be within ±10 % of design value for consent compliance.

UV/H2O2 vs Competing AOP Technologies

AttributeUV/H2O2O3/UVPhoto-FentonO3 Only
SludgeNoneNoneMedium–highNone
pH window5.5–7.06–92.5–3.56–9
HRT5–30 min10–30 min30–120 min10–30 min
Energy (kWh/kg COD)4–83–61.5–4.0 (solar)2.5–5.0
Best forLow TSS, water reuseMicropollutants, pharmaHigh COD, coloured effluentDecolourisation, disinfection

Troubleshooting & Maintenance

UVT Degradation

Influent UVT drops due to humics or colour. Pre-treat with coagulation or GAC if UVT <55 %. Online UVT analyser triggers automatic H2O2 dose reduction to avoid excess residual.

Lamp Aging & Output Decay

Low-pressure Hg lamps lose 10–15 % output per 8,000 h; medium-pressure 20–30 % per 5,000 h. Replace at 80 % of nominal output. Calibrate UV intensity sensor quarterly.

Residual H2O2 Breakthrough

If quench system fails, residual >0.1 mg/L can corrode downstream stainless steel. Install redundant bisulfite dosing with ORP feedback control.

Temperature Effects

Reactor temperature >35 °C accelerates H2O2 thermal decomposition and reduces UV lamp efficiency. Provide ventilation or cooling water for medium-pressure lamps.

Regulatory & Validation Standards

DVGW W 294

German technical rule for UV disinfection β€” dose validation, sensor placement and monitoring protocols.

USEPA UVGM (2006)

U.S. UV Guidance Manual for validated dose calculation, reactor certification and RED testing.

ISO 11348

Water quality β€” determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on V. fischeri (luminescent bacteria test) for AOP effluent toxicity screening.

EN 60204-1

Safety of UV reactor electrical systems, including earth-fault and emergency-stop interlocks.

Need This Process for Your Application?

Our engineers design and commission complete treatment systems including all equipment, automation, and commissioning support.

Industries We Serve

Our expertise spans multiple industries with sector-specific water treatment solutions.